Regional autonomy…or nothing

Click banner for more info

Being the position paper of Yoruba groups towards achieving regional autonomy

Regional Autonomy means…

a. Control of natural resources within the region.

b. Developing and establishing appropriate governance structure for the Region, and

c. Devolved authority, responsibilities and span of control to manage and ensure the sustenance of the region.

Dr. Chukwuemeka Ezeife [Okwadike] – former Governor of old Anambra State and a delegate at the 2014 National Conference in an interview with Newswatch on 12 May 2014 [Retrieved 12 May 2014, mydailynewswatchng.com] said: “The only zone that is very strong because of their rationality is the South-West. Even if others do not embark on federating unit based on zones, the South-West is going to have their region intact economically; then, they will develop, progress, grow and every part of Nigeria would be envious of the region. It is the decision they are taking now. Some people don‘t understand it. At least, they taught some of us, but it is the truth that I am saying now that the South-West will grow exponentially when regional government is adopted.”

Nigeria, as a nation, should therefore translate to…

a. A restructured country with Regional arrangements via the consolidation of the current unviable thirty six [36] states. The consolidation would be based on the congregation of nations and affiliate groups with common and historic affinities and who enjoy territorial contiguity borders. Any ethnic group or groups within a state wishing to align with any other state or to belong to a new Region shall be allowed to do so if confirmed in a plebiscite by the affected people. For instance, Yoruba people in Edo, Kogi and Kwara states.

b. The Regions exercising all powers not expressly ceded to the central government. As such, the federal constitution will contain only one legislative list – the Exclusive Legislative List – that shall detail the powers and responsibilities to be exercised by the central government.

c. Each Region having its constitution, which will reflect its peculiarities, circumstances and preferences that shall not be inconsistent with the constitution of the Nigerian Federation.

d. All tiers and structures of government below the Regional level prescribed in the Regional constitution, and should not be the concern of the Federal Government. The present state governments will be retained within the new Regional framework and local government councils would be accommodated with law enacted, in each Region, prescribing their structure, composition, roles and purposes, finance and administration.

SECTION A

Our stance as Yoruba people

This submission represents the culmination of efforts and ideas which have been canvassed in the Yoruba landscape since the agitation for a return to true federalism, led by those seeking a solution to the perennial crisis of governance in Nigeria. These positions were reinforced at the 2014 Yoruba Constitutional Conferences of February 12 and 20 respectively, at the House of Chiefs, Secretariat of Oyo State Government, Ibadan. The conference had in attendance Yoruba organisations and prominent sons and daughters of Yoruba extraction. The positions is also been detailed in the publication – Yoruba Agenda.

WHAT YORUBA PEOPLE WANT…OUR IRREDUCIBLE MINIMUM

The Yoruba democratic objective is to secure an abundant life and peaceful existence for all our people, and to preserve the liberty and rights of citizens of our region. These include:

- the right to freely elect our representatives in an atmosphere of freedom and civility

- the right to religious worship and practices

- the right to reject any form of oppression, and

- the right to legislate for the common good and wellbeing of our people and our nation.

The Yoruba aim is to be partners in the creation of a state where the citizens are recognized by the government and the government serves the interests of the citizens (Folorunsho, 2014).

For us Yoruba people, we demand Regional Autonomy for the South-West Region within a united Nigeria. Yoruba people will effectively communicate to all other ethnic nationalities an understanding of the aims and objectives of the Yoruba people in the following contexts of:

A YORUBA PEOPLE – Cultural/Language Homogeneity

A YORUBA REGION – States/Geographic Zone and

A YORUBA NATION – A shared vision (Yoruba Agenda, 2012).

The YORUBA PEOPLE OF NIGERIA hereby make the following demands:

a. Regionalism: a restructured Nigeria federation consisting of a Central Government and Regional governments of other ethnic nationalities – this could be based on the current six geopolitical zones. The South-West Region must include all Yoruba people outside the imposed artificial boundaries, in Edo, Delta, Kogi and Kwara states.

b. A negotiated legislative Exclusive, Concurrent and Residual list

c. A unicameral legislature at the center; details of the Regional legislature shall be clearly set out in the constitution of each Region

d. A parliamentary form of government at the centre

e. The right to self determination on and up to the right to secede

f. A just and equitable taxation system that will treat the federating units with equality and better coordination at the federal level in order to eliminate the current rentier syndrome.

g. Fiscal Federalism and Resource Control: a system whereby a substantial part of the proceeds accruable from every Region will be domiciled in the Region and an agreed percentage contributed to the center by the federating units for the responsibility of the Federal government.

h. Establishment of Regional Police

i. A new people‘s constitution: the resolutions and conclusions of the 2014 National Conference shall lead to an autochthonous Constitution, that is a home-grown and all inclusive draft that shall be submitted to the Nigerian electorate voting in a Referendum

j. Status of Lagos: Lagos will continue to be the economic nerve centre of Nigeria and the West African sub-Region, hence, there shall be an appropriate budgetary provision that is part of the First Line Charge in the Federation Account.

―Unity is a derivative, it is not a goal…it is an aberration to talk of unity in a federation…we do not need unity to be in a federal arrangement…all we need is an agreement between the federating

units… (Views expressed by Prof Ayoade and Prof Ariyo at a policy discussion at the Yoruba Academy, 9 April 2014)

PREFACE & PURPOSE

In the beginning, there was no Nigeria. There were ethnic nationalities and Kingdoms. Prior to the British conquest and invasion of the different ethnic nationalities that make up the present day Nigeria, these nations were independent nation states [Sagay, 2011]. Hence, there is a need to revisit what was agreed at the various constitutional conferences that led to the First Republic and Nigeria‘s independence in 1960. Knowledge of this would re-awaken a better understanding of the arrangements agreed to by ethnic nationalities that led to the emergence of Nigeria as a federated nation.

This forced marriage of diverse ethno-national groups has produced tension and difficult moments for the country, Nigeria. The next step in charting a course for the future is to safeguard the destiny of the Yoruba people, and reconstruct the Nigerian federation. This is the first intent of this publication, that is, a revisit and reinstating of the agenda of the Yoruba people…what Yoruba people want.

While Yoruba people do not ask other ethnic nationalities to change their focus, we also expect others to refrain from imposing their own goals and values on Yoruba people [Yoruba Agenda, 2012] – all ethnic nationalities can co-exist in Nigeria so long as there are mutual respect for each other‘s positions, as everyone has a right to decide to live within or outside of Nigeria. A recent publication, titled “Key issues before the Northern delegates to the 2014 National Conference,” where the North claims to be …the backbone and strength of Nigeria necessitated a strategic appraisal and response. This is the second intent of this publication – it is the need to employ an evidenced-based methodology to address and correct an attempt by a section of Nigeria to distort history and repaint the existential context of Nigerians.

The Northern reasoning – in the publication – can be summed up as; Nigeria is two countries of Northern and Southern Nigeria, oil exploration in the Niger Delta was financed by Northern groundnut proceeds and the North feeds the rest of the South with daily supplies of cows…therefore the North is equally entitled to Niger Delta oil proceeds as the Niger Deltans themselves (Sagay, 2014).

The North‘s obsession with revenue sharing and the proceeds of oil, exposed a jaundiced vision of the developmental aspiration of a people. The publication also exposed some inherent contradictions in thoughts, for example a claim that …Nigeria is de facto two countries of Northern and Southern Nigeria… (Chap 7, Sec 1.1, p. 32). Hence, there is an acute need to demonstrate that Nigeria is NOT just North and South, the North, as defined and described in the publication, ceased to exist the day Gen. Yakubu Gowon (retd.) created 12 Nigerian States in 1967…the North is NOT 80% of the Nigerian land mass, as claimed by this publication.

Assertions of this nature are clear indications that Nigeria is still searching for an answer to the National Question, which defines how Nigerians should live together as a nation. At the heart of solving this therefore, is the adoption of a widely acceptable structure of government, to which everyone could identify with. This is the third intent of this publication – explicating policy positions that defines and describes how Nigeria should be structured and governed.

Nigeria – Information Data

Table 1 is extracted from the publication – “Key issues before the Northern delegates to the 2014 National Conference.” The data stated are erroneous and ignores the legitimacy of other geo- political zones/arrangements.

Table 2 provides a detailed analysis of Nigeria information data [Yoruba Academy, May 2014].

Table 1: Nigeria Information Data Source: “Key issues before the Northern delegates to the 2014 National Conference.”

Table 2: Nigeria Information Data

Analysis by: Yoruba Academy, May 2014

*Note:

- The numbers of languages in Nigeria are 529, of these, 7 are extinct. Of the living languages, 21 are institutional, 76 are developing, 357 are vigorous, 26 are in ‗trouble, and 42 are dying. [Ethnologue, 2014]

- A total of 43 languages are been shared by more than one Region

Data Sources

Aluko, Mobolaji E. 2011. Voters‘ registration by state. Created on 06 March 2011 web: Nigeria Village Square, INEC 2 Nigerian Population Commission. 2006. Population, landmass, density); NPC Report, 1991 and Field Reports INEC. Retrieved 2014. LG, federal constituencies, senatorial districts: election candidates 2011. Ethnologue.com. 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Seventeenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version

YORUBA…OUR CONTEXT AS A PEOPLE

Yoruba people developed one of the most sophisticated and well-balanced political and governance systems in the world, from the 10th century on – a political system based on the sovereignty of the people, with strong dedication to the dignity of life, human freedom, and accountability in leadership and governance. This was confirmed in Report 1114 – the 1921 Annual Colonial Report on Nigeria by the British, when it states that ‗…the Yoruba occupy the South-West corner of Nigeria and from an early date possessed an organized government‘ [p.3].

During a brief period of our modern history, our modern leaders, authentic products of our history and culture, under the exceptional leadership of our topmost statesman of the time – Chief Obafemi Awolowo – served the Yoruba people with the very best government in the whole of Africa. Under their leadership, the Western Region became the pace-setter in virtually all aspects of modern development. As examples, the Region developed programmes that empowered Yoruba people to become some of the most productive in Africa. The Region became ―First in Africa [Oodua Foundation, 2014]. As a people, the

Yoruba were and are still absolutely set on accomplishing greater things. Our firm belief as a people is that we can still do it any time we set our hearts and hands to it [Oodua Foundation, 2014].

Our obstacle is Nigeria…

The current Nigeria is not oriented towards development, progress or prosperity. Nigeria now tends towards the maximization of power by the federal establishment. As a result, authority and control in Nigeria have been accumulated in the confines of the Federal Government. Nigeria, a country of different nations, has reduced the governments of the states of the Nigerian Federation to the level of impotency and incapability. These have stunted the growth and development of the states and their citizens.

Yoruba people aspire for development and the well being of its people noting the potentials and attainment of the South West, despite the limiting environment called Nigeria.

The South-West of Nigeria is a Region with…

A landmass of approximately 80,000 square kilometers and a current [2013] estimated population of 40 million people – more populous than:

•20 countries in Europe – Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Demark, Finland, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland;

•41 countries in Africa – Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Swaziland, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe;

•17 countries in the Americas – Bahamas, Barbados, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El-Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay and Venezuela;

•13 countries in the Middle East – Bahrain, Brunei, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirate and Yemen; and 6 countries of Asia – Cambodia, North Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Sri Lanka and Taiwan [Yoruba Agenda, 2012].

Unique geography, competencies and resources and is positioned as the hub of development and growth of Nigeria into the 22nd Century

The foremost urban civilization in Black Africa. Our first town, Ile-Ife, was built in the early 10th Century, during the European ―Dark Age when most of Europe had no towns, with a level of urbanisation more advanced than that of the countries of Europe in the same period (Oodua Foundation, 2014).

One of the fastest growing economic blocs in Nigeria and the world, with a combined GDP of $69.1billion, constituting 25.3% of the national GDP (2012 estimates) and a GDP per capita of $11,341 – a gross Regional output that grew the most in 2012 with an absolute nominal increase of 21.8% nominal growth – compared to 16.38% in the North West, 14.27% in North Central, 10.89% in the South East, 8.19% in the North East and -1.69% in the South-South, Over 60% of Nigeria‘s industrial capacity and approximately 60% of the country‘s banking assets plus 67% of its insurance assets…

Two of Nigeria‘s most important deep seaports – Lagos Port Complex, Apapa & Tin Can Island – handling over 100 million tonnes of goods p.a. valued at an estimated $2b in 2012, alongside its profitable land borders that accounts for 60% of the trading and commercial activities in Nigeria The most performing non-oil sectors of the economy, which include telecommunications [32%], building and construction [12.5%], solid minerals [12.5%], hotel and restaurants [12.5%], real estate [10.4%] and business services [9.7%]…A financial services infrastructure that includes 22 national commercial banking institutions, 20 finance companies, 20 primary mortgage institutions, 2 merchant banks, 20 micro-finance banks and 5 development finance institutions, with extensive network of branches, and most significant operations in Nigeria. These institutions command money assets to the tune of N6.4 billion [May 2013]

One of the fastest growing economies in the world, of comparative size to other national economies. For instance, Lagos State produces about 12% of Nigeria‘s GDP, which is equivalent to almost $32billion [according to the 2013 estimates], making it Africa‘s 13th largest economy ahead of Tanzania

Great tourism potentials due to the peculiarity of its history and distinct geography, and capabilities in ICT and other skilled professions

The most conducive and safest part of the country for investors and visitors. Of the top 20 cities that McKinsey has identified as growth hot spots for companies targeting young, entry level consumers, Lagos and Ibadan are included in the list, alongside other urban centres such as Dar Es Salaam, Ouagadougou, Kampala and Lusaka.

A competitive advantage that is leveraged on its strategic assets of a unique communality of language, customs and culture among its peoples; a demography consisting of an exceptionally youthful population; huge human and material resources including a large knowledgeable Diaspora; vast tracts of arable agricultural land, renewable water resources, and the presence of extensive mineral deposits, such as hydrocarbons, etc. [Source: DAWN Commission, 2012].

The unfettered autonomy to develop the Yoruba Nation as a federating unit in Nigeria is the only factor that is missing in efforts to industrialise our Region. All the ingredients for socio-economic development are present in Yoruba land and the question of viability and sustainability does not arise [Yoruba Agenda, 2012]

Therefore…for Yoruba people, it is REGIONAL AUTONOMY…OR NOTHING!

THE 2014 NATIONAL CONFERENCE TO DATE…

Revisiting the need for a national conversation…

As a nation, we must talk.

The clamour for a national dialogue among Nigeria‘s over 250 ethnic nationalities has been as old as the country itself. This became more popular after the first military coup in 1966. The imperative for a National Conference as a necessary discussion over Nigeria‘s future has been firmly established and constantly agitated for by many, especially we the Yoruba people. This national discussion is meant to be the laxative to corruption, ethnic chauvinism, conflict and perversion of the rule of law – all of which have stifled economic development, social harmony and the forging of a collective Nigerian identity.

Therefore, there is no doubt that there is need for consensus among the country‘s distinct ethnic groups on critical national and governance issues such as the structure and form of government, revenue allocation, and political representation. Haven established an acute need to restructure Nigeria; a national conference cannot and should not be about what is least disruptive in our discourse of Nigeria‘s future [Ariyo, 2014]. The question is whether the 2014 National Conference, with its prescribed modality, is capable of addressing Nigeria‘s perennial existential problems.

This is why Yoruba people are revisiting the debate. The 2014 National Conference must be a discourse aimed at inclusive nation-building. Yoruba people will not be part of a charade that will not create the needed national consensus on key issues in the country. The conference must be markedly different from previous ones. The 2014 National Conference must emerge with outcomes that must be enduring solutions to perennial and contentious national issues.

The 2014 National Conference…to date…

The conference commenced against a backdrop of pervasive cynicism about the real intentions of the President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan and serious doubts about the leadership‘s capacity – implying a requirement of personal strength of character and political clout, to deliver the radical restructuring that are necessary to resolve the fundamental problem of the legitimacy of the Nigeria Project.

Despite these thoughts and views, it was rightly decided that a strong presence of South West delegates are required at the conference to advocate a radical restructuring of Nigeria. Optimists perceived the conference as a golden opportunity to undertake a holistic transformation of the federation, to realign its structures, and commence the institution of attitudinal changes necessary to locate Nigeria on a trajectory of political stability and economic development.

However, the first two weeks of the National Conference was expended on debating the President‘s speech. This appeared a delay tactics and red herring. From a security intelligence perspective, it also created an opportunity for the system to enable the delegates to espouse their stance, views and

positions and for the delegates to be profiled based on these. The Emir of Adamawa‘s submission on the floor of the National Conference on 27 March 2014 signalled some of the North‘s intent which has been suggested to be blackmailing the nation to submission, resulting in the retention of the status quo.

It has been well argued that a multi-cultural and multi-lingual country needs, at the very least, a federal system of government if it is to achieve any measure of economic, social and political development [Awolowo, later conceptualized as ‗cultural democracy‘ in Sekoni, 2013, p.37]. However, signals emerging from the on-going national conference indicate a resistance to the radical restructuring of the country to consolidate the nation‘s unwieldy and unsustainable political structures. This will invariably slow the potentials in Regional Integration – a model that enhances the capacities of the consolidated entities to undertake meaningful integrated planning and development along geo-regional and ethnic nationality lines.

This direction of travel is a rejection of the imperative for a profound realignment of and political restructuring of the nation by the consolidation of the unwieldy and unsustainable 36 state structure into six geo-regional political arrangement. With this impending outcome, the 2014 National Conference appears to have entrenched the very logic of operations that has brought Nigeria to the precipice.

Our stance…

The South West is committed to the consolidation of the 36 state structures into a Regional structure. This is what is in the best interest of Nigeria and the people of each Region. The South West is reaffirming and rededicating itself to this principle. Any attempt to only tinker with the splintering of Nigeria [for instance, the recommendation to create an additional state in the South East] will only entrench a logic that has proven deleterious for Nigeria‘s political and economic development. Its implications would be felt on all other critical dimensions of Nigeria‘s over-centralised governance; in resource mobilisation and revenue sharing formula, in the continued concentration of the national security in federal hands; in impeding integrated planning for socio-economic development along Regional lines.

The continuing structural imbalance of Nigeria is detrimental to the attainment of dynamic and progressive constituent units of the country and would continue to be an impediment to social and economic development of the South West, South South, South East and indeed the North. As a nation, there is the need to achieve a radical transformation of ‗Project Nigeria‘. Inherent in the emerging outcomes of the 2014 National Conference is the danger of exacerbating the problems of the more dynamic constituent sections of the country that are determined to join the global race for rapid transformations – such as the Yoruba people. Hence, Yoruba people would not be rail-roaded into endorsing premeditated outcomes that further undermine our development and the execution of laudable Regional developmental initiatives.

For Yoruba people, it is REGIONAL AUTONOMY…OR NOTHING!

Section B

Some “North-y” claims and assertions

…addressing the fallacies and hyperbolic self-assessments.

―The greatest threat to freedom is the absence of criticism – Wole Soyinka

INTRODUCTION

A publication that acknowledges the collaboration of the Northern Governors and other socio-political organisations in the North was presented to the 2014 National Conference, in May 2014. This publication, titled Key issues before the Northern delegates to the 2014 National Conference, attempts to distort Nigerian history and re-calibrate the geography of the nation, in a manner reminiscent of Hausa-Fulani approach to national political matters – before and after independence. This publication – a hyperbolic self-assessment [Sekoni, 2014 b] – explicitly directed at and against the South, is littered with non- evidenced and poorly referenced assertions and claims about the North being the backbone and pillar of Nigeria.

Noting that President Goodluck Jonathan, in his opening address, admonished the 2014 National Conference to be open to ― table thoughts and positions on issues, and make recommendations that advance togetherness, and that delegates should not ― approach…issues with suspicion and antagonism, in order to ensure a stronger, more united, peaceful and politically stable Nigeria – this publication that insults the rest of the country with the imperial language that subtends its claims, is at variance with these pronouncements and needlessly provocative. Without doubt, a release with the subtitle of ―Northern Nigeria: the Backbone and Strength of Nigeria‖ smacks of gross insensitivity to the feelings of ethnic nationalities outside the orbit of the North [Sekoni, 2014 a].

The 2014 National Conference appears to have created a space for ethnic nationalities to unearth their long established fear, political, ethnical and cultural subconscious. These are confirmed in the writings of Lennox-Boyd – Secretary of State for the Colonies – when he writes that ……although they wish to remain and continue as part of the federation, the people of Northern Nigeria are still entertaining certain fears about Southern domination. It is the duty of the South to help allay these fears [Hon. Mr. T. Lennox-Boyd Secretary of State for the Colonies, Lagos, January 30, 1955 in Aderemi, 2005].

Therefore, Northern Governors, Arewa Consultative Forum, and other organisations consulted before the crafting of the North‘s position paper have clearly exteriorised the innards of the Region‘s political assessment of Nigerians, and indeed the South.

This section is therefore dedicated to addressing some of the claims and assertions made in the publication – Key issues before the Northern delegates to the 2014 National Conference.

The history and national memory of a nation of are too valuable to be tinkered with.

The contributions of the North was used to develop the Nigeria oil sector…the North played a key role in the financing of oil exploration in the Niger Delta…and made sacrifices in resources and human life to develop the oil industry…Chap 2, Sec 2.4 a & b, p. 5.

1. This claim is false. Every part of Nigeria contributed to its growth and development.

2. History of oil exploration in Nigeria

2.1 In 1908, a German company named the Nigerian Bitumen Company, commenced oil exploration.

It stopped its activities in 1914 at the start of the First World War.

2.2 The second attempt at oil prospecting in Nigeria was in 1937 by a company called Shell D‘Arcy. Shell D‘Arcy also stopped operations in 1940 because of the Second World War. In 1946, Shell Company partnered with British Petroleum [BP] to establish the Shell BP Company which finally discovered oil at Oloibiri in 1956. These companies were later joined by Elf, Texaco, Agip, Gulf Oil, Mobil Producing and other oil prospecting and producing companies [Sagay, 2014].

2.3 At the end of the civil war, the Nigeria National Oil Corporation was formed in 1971 to coordinate government‘s control of this upcoming industry. In 1971, Nigeria joined the OPEC. On April 1, 1973, the Federal Government of Nigeria began a gradual participation in the industry, with a Joint Venture Agreement with various crude oil producers; Shell BP, Mobil Producing, Gulf Oil (Later Chevron), Tenneco and other industry players [Aderemi, 2004, p. 38].

3. From these early beginnings – 1908 to date – all initial expenses for prospecting and producing oil are borne exclusively by the foreign multinationals and oil companies. The Nigerian Federal Government spends nothing of its own funds in the industry, except for cash calls which are paid for by proceeds of petroleum. The Nigerian Federal Government has been a beneficiary of the petroleum proceeds from the investments and activities of the oil multinationals. The NNPC investments in oil prospecting only occurred in Northern part of the Nigeria, for example, the Benue through, the Chad Basin and in Bauchi State [Aderemi, 2004]. The funds utilised by the NNPC in these Northern areas were obtained from proceeds of oil operations [Sagay, 2014].

4. While the North produced groundnut and cotton, Western Nigeria produced Cocoa, Mid- Western Nigeria produced rubber, palm oil, palm kernel and timber, Eastern Nigeria which included present day Niger Delta produced palm oil, kernel, and timber. The producers sold their produce and kept the income for their use, only the export duty of the agricultural products was shared in the basis of 50% derivation, 30% distributable funds for the Regions and 20% to the Federal Government.

5. Under the Revenue Allocation formula of the First Republic, it was the North that benefitted financially from the contributions of the other three Regions and not the other way round. In the allocation of the 30% from the Distributable Pool Account, the North received a disproportionate share. Out of the 30% of the resources of all the four Regions paid into that Account, the percentage paid to each Region was as follows:

a) to Northern Nigeria, forty ninety-fifths ;

b) to Eastern Nigeria, thirty-one ninety-fifths ;

c) to Western Nigeria, eighteen ninety-fifths ;

d) to Mid –Western Nigeria, six ninety-fifths [Section 141, p.66, 1963 Nigeria Constitution]

Thus, documented evidence indicates that since 1914, the North has been and continues to be a major beneficiary of the financial output of the whole country.

6. The Niger Delta was not financed by the proceeds of Northern groundnut and cotton. The North appears to have completely abandoned any pretence at productivity and internally generated revenue, with a dependency on the monthly federal allocation and a developed addiction to the proceeds of oil revenue [Sagay, 2014]. Nigeria, as a nation, is also addicted to the proceeds of oil and gas and this need to be replaced with innovative means of exploring other natural resources in other parts of Nigeria.

++++++++++++

Agriculture in the North still contributes much more to the national economy…Chap 1, Sec 1.3, p. 1.

7. According to Colonial Report-Annual No 878 for the year 1914, the principal exports were as follows:

Products           1913 (£)                                 1914(£)

Cocoa                157,480                  171,751

Cotton Lint       159,223                  50,791

Hides & Skin   197,214                   505,785

Groundnuts     174,716                   179,219

Tin                      568,428                                 706,988

Timber              106,050                  86,522

Palm Oil            1,854,384               1,571,691

Table 3: Nigeria principal exports, 1913 & 1914

From this table, it is clear that the South contributed substantially to agricultural production and export, nullifying the North‘s claim.

8. Recent economic report clearly nullifies this claim. The current and fastest growing industry in Nigeria is the service sector. This is confirmed by a recent 2014 economic report and analysis from Africa News Update, where it is affirmed that it is the rapid growth of information and communications technology (ICT), banking, trade and the informal economy – see Box A below.

9. Whist it is acknowledged that the North currently has approximately 75% of the spread of the top 11 agricultural crops produce in Nigeria, the South also has 60% of the spread of same crops, noting the lesser land mass of the South compared to the North – see Table 4.

10. What the nation need, is a drastic reduction on the dependency on oil and the speeding up of the exploration and exploitation of other natural resources that are evenly spread across all parts of the country – see Table 5. This can be better achieved under a true‘ and fiscal‘ federal arrangement.

According to the rebased figures, six sectors now account for 70% of nominal GDP rather than three in the old series. The service sector grew fastest, by 240%, and progressively constitutes a larger portion of the GDP. Conversely, the share of the two hitherto giants – agriculture and oil has fallen to 21% and 14.4% respectively. Nigeria is transiting to a services-driven economy due to the rapid growth of information and communications technology (ICT), banking, trade and the informal economy.

Zenith Bank, UBA and Guaranty Trust Bank are Nigerian financial institutions with a huge presence across the continent. Mobile phone subscription has exploded from just 2.2 million lines in 2002 to over 169 million by 2013. Call credit vendors, petty traders and other unofficial activities in the informal economy have also been included in the new series, as a component of the services sector.

The emergence of the service sector as a major growth driver indicates a greater diversification of the country‘s production structure away from oil (a long sought after goal). The share of the oil and gas sector has fallen from 32.4% of GDP in the old series to just 14.4% in the new series. On one hand this is good news, on the other hand, it reveals deeper structural distortions.

While agricultural output has increased, it has grown much more slowly than the capital, technology and skills intensive services sector. Agriculture‘s decline as a share of GDP has more implications in the Northern states, where it dominates. Critically, the diminishing share of agriculture as a percentage of GDP, which should indicate economic development in an industrialising economy, is not the case in Nigeria. Hundreds of textile, food and beverage and other light manufacturing industries lie moribund in industrial hubs in Kaduna and Kano states. Electricity shortages, infrastructural decay and influx of cheap Chinese imports and smuggled consumer goods are some of the factors attributed to the acceleration of de-industrialisation in the North. Tellingly, farmers are not leaving their farmlands in villages to become factory workers in modern industries, but are urbanising in the fringes and becoming an underclass in the vast unofficial activities in the informal sector

Although some states like Kano have a vibrant trade-based economy (and the Kannywood local entertainment sector is booming), economic output in the Northern states is mostly agrarian. On the other hand, the services sector – banks, telecoms, hospitality, trade – are mostly concentrated in the South. Of the 21 commercial banks in the country, only one is owned by and headquartered in the North.

Even in the South, Lagos and to a lesser extent, the four major oil-producing states, account for the bulk of economic output. Lagos, where most banks, financial institutions, telecoms firms, oil companies and other private sector organisations are headquartered could be Africa‘s fifth largest economy, if it were a separate country. As an outlier, it is the only self-sufficient state out of 35 others, able to generate over 50% of its revenues from internal sources more than its monthly allocations from the centre We can deduce from the new series as to why Nigeria‘s economic boom is not only non-inclusive, but geographically concentrated, in which many Northern states lag behind.

Usman, Zainab. May 6, 2014. Nigeria: The economic transition reveals deep structural distortions (analysis) African Arguments in AFRICA NEWS UPDATE.

On federalism…

In certain sections and quarters of the country, there is a bogey about genuine federalism as a tool of division and an instrument of separatism which glorifies unfair natural advantages and accidental luck over the less fortunate sections of the country. Nothing can be farther from the truth. These notions and fears arise from misconceptions and misapprehensions about the nature of true federalism. The truth of the matter is that when properly harnessed, true federalism reflects the strengths and virtues of the constituent units of an ethnically diverse nation in a way that brings out the best of these constituent units for the collective good of the nation.

In fact in some melting pots of the old territories, there was so much inter-ethnic co-mingling that a cultural mutation and the birth of new ethnic groups arose. The case of the Arogbow-Ijaw people, the Okun Yoruba and the Akoko Edo people come to mind. In the East, the North and the Niger Delta areas, there is also evidence of extensive cohabitation among the various ethnic groups even when this took place on the terms of the host communities. The various Sabon-gari, or strangers‘ quarters, attest to this fact. There is no pure or ideal federalism anywhere in the world. The very concept has to be grasped in dynamic action that is as it is seen in the actual process of governance. It has never been possible to legislate federalism. In other words, federalism is a process, a journey and not a destination [Lt. Gen. Alani Akinriande [rtd.] – extract from a speech delivered at the Ijaw Day Celebration, 1 May, 2014].

True federalism presupposes that the national and Regional governments should stand to each other in a relation of meaningful independence resting upon a balanced division of powers and resources (Nwabuese, 1983)1…the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria was amended, but issues of ―true federalism were not amended [Ariyo, 2014].

Propositions being made in the name of operating ‘true federalism’, ‘fiscal federalism’ and the like, are borne either out of political manoeuvres or political ignorance, or both…Chap 5, Sec 1.1, p. 15.

11. Federalism, in practice, is a system of voluntary self-rule and shared rule. This is implied in the derivation of the word ‘federal’, which comes from the Latin word ‗foedus‘, meaning covenant. A covenant signifies a binding partnership among co-equals in which the parties to the covenant retain their individual identity and integrity while creating a new entity [as defined by Prof. John Kincaid, Lafayette College, Pennsylvania]. It is acknowledged that the Nigerian Federal system of government, in practice, falls short of this definition.

12. The North‘s view that Nigeria‘s federalism does not fit into the pattern of classical

federalism – e.g. USA – does not negate the need for other nations to seek and develop

their own form of federalism. The American states that chose to go into a federation were

as independent as Nigerian ethnic nationalities at the point of colonization and

amalgamation [Sekoni, 2014 b].

13. Sekoni [2014, b] further argues, that ―another naïve definition of federalism is the claim by the North that federalism is a system that ensures being a brother‘s keeper. There is nothing in the history of territorial federalism or ethnic federalism that suggests that the raison d‘être of creating federations is for constituent parts to serve as brother‘s keepers. If anything, all examples of federalism—in North America, in South America, in Europe, in Asia, and even in some parts of Africa—indicate that federations are created so that constituent parts can be partners, who through the process of cooperation assist each other to achieve its goals of self-development and self-preservation through harnessing of energies of the partners.

14. As opposed to the claim made in the North‘s publication, it is the current Nigerian constitutional arrangement that denies federating units, within the Nigeria space, the opportunity and benefits of cultural democracy‘ i.e. the right of each nationality to live its culture, refine it and use its dominant values to plan, at its own pace – develop its space. No country in the world where people are forced to co-exist on disagreeable terms lasts and Nigeria will not be an exception, if true federalism is not entrenched as a national principle of coexistence. It was clear from the beginning that a unitary system will not work in Nigeria as Lugard‘s attempt to construct Nigerian unity through an amalgamation failed.

15. At the Nigerian Constitutional Conferences of 1951 and 1954, delegations opted unanimously for Federalism. They also established the view that over-centralisation would be a grave error “in this vast country with its widely differing conditions and needs”, and that the policy which had received enthusiastic support throughout the country was the policy of achieving unity at the Centre through strength in the Regions. It was confidently expressed and expected that when the Regions felt that they had wide powers to run their own Regional affairs, they would be more likely ready to co-operate with the other Regions through their representatives in the Council of Ministers and the House of Representatives in serving the interest of Nigeria as a whole” [Sagay, 2011].

16. Federal Government of Nigeria is an agency of the Nigerian ethnic nationalities. In fact, the current pseudo-federal system is an aberration to what obtained in the beginning. Lugard, in his inaugural speech as Nigerian Governor General, did not abolish the Lagos Colony‘s Legislative Council even though other colonies lacked such structures. Lugard amalgamated the colonies to form Nigeria and still had the wisdom to allow each Protectorate to grow at its pace. Devolution of power and fiscal federalism principles were entrenched then as each Lieutenant-Governor had their secretariat through which they govern – i.e. controlled the political, medical, public works, forestry, agriculture, education, prisons, and mines department. The Lieutenant-Governor of the Southern Provinces had, in addition, control over the maritime, customs, and printing departments [Mohammed, 2013, p.4].

17. Lugard‘s successor, Clifford wrote on assumption of office that; ―…if the ideal at which we should aim is, as I hold it should be, the eventual evolution, not only of an ―amalgamated, but of a united Nigeria, it is essential that the co-ordination of all administrative work, political and non-political alike, should be directed from a single centre… co-ordination does not mean uniformity; the past few years have seen an attempt at uniformity with mischievous results… uniformity has been sought by endeavoring to level down the southern provinces rather than by leveling up the northern provinces. [Clifford to Lord Milner, the British Secretary of State, 3 Dec., 1919 cited in Ballard, 1971].

18. The operation of true federalism and fiscal federalism‘ is germane to the future existence of Nigeria as a nation. Also see Section C: for policy papers on;

*        Devolution of Power

• Form of Government
• Structure of Government and
• Fiscal federalism, revenue sharing and resource control.