Not
two days, but only two hours are allocated now for the partners to
discuss the key issues of interactions between Russia and the European
Union. Moscow and Brussels have agreed that consideration of the details
of numerous joint projects could wait, and they needed to focus on the
issues of strategic partnership.
The
matter will, of course, concern the economy and more specifically –
energy, trade, international obligations and neighborly policy. It is
unlikely that the President of Russia and his European colleagues will
be able to avoid a conversation about the situation in Ukraine in the
light of the last months’ events. The matter is that the European Union
categorically rejects Moscow’s integration efforts in the Eurasian
region, expert of the Institute of Europe Vladislav Belov says.
"We
are talking about the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan
and the creation in 2015 of the Eurasian Economic Union. In the
framework of the still frozen new basic agreement between Russia and the
EU, Brussels does not agree with such development of events, assuring
Moscow that the Eurasian vector contradicts the interests of the
European Union and is beyond the scope of bilateral relations. The
Russian side, in its turn, insists that the integration processes on the
post-Soviet space serve the interests of both sides."
Most
of the current contradictions between partners are derived from this
fundamental disagreement. Apparently, it is not by accident that after
the defeat of the "EuroMaidan’s" supporters in Ukraine and abroad, who
were by all means trying to drag this country into a "European Paradise"
contrary to elementary logic and economic interests of the Ukrainians,
the dialogue on a visa-free regime between Russia and the EU is stalled
once again. Here is what political analyst Alexei Kuznetsov told our source on this matter.
"We
see the reluctance of the EU to move forward in this direction for
political reasons.
And this issue is fundamental, it opens the way to establishing common space between Russia and the EU, which was announced many years ago. Under the current barrier in the form of the visa regime it is difficult to expect further development of humanitarian contacts, intensive scientific research, and real ties of small and medium business. The EU will be pulling our leg once again."
And this issue is fundamental, it opens the way to establishing common space between Russia and the EU, which was announced many years ago. Under the current barrier in the form of the visa regime it is difficult to expect further development of humanitarian contacts, intensive scientific research, and real ties of small and medium business. The EU will be pulling our leg once again."
The
issues related to attempts of discriminating Russian companies in the
framework of the Third Energy Package are not finally settled yet. Not
everything is running smoothly between Russia and the EU after the
former’s recent entry into the WTO. Thus, European countries go on with
their protectionist policies in relation to their own producers and
oppose similar measures on the part of Moscow. The partners haven’t also
come to mutual agreement on the issue connected with the European
Commission’s demand to revise the legal base of the South Stream gas
pipeline construction.
The European officials believe that Russia’s bilateral agreements with Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia violate the EU law. At the meantime they forget that intergovernmental agreements on the international law prevail over all European legislation. In the present political context, it seems to be unduly even to recall the creation of the missile defence system in Europe. In this regard, the progress is not even within hailing distance.
The European officials believe that Russia’s bilateral agreements with Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia violate the EU law. At the meantime they forget that intergovernmental agreements on the international law prevail over all European legislation. In the present political context, it seems to be unduly even to recall the creation of the missile defence system in Europe. In this regard, the progress is not even within hailing distance.
However,
it is the real economy that stands behind these not very optimistic
trends. And things are not so bad in this field. The trade turnover
between Russia and the EU is estimated in hundreds of billions of
dollars and has no objective reasons for sharp fluctuations, especially
to the negative side. Tens of millions of inhabitants of the Old World
have a daily need in Russian energy resources, and this fact cannot be
easily filed away in storage. So, neither Moscow nor Brussels will
benefit from acting to the detriment of the established mutually
beneficial balance and far-reaching joint plans for the sake of the
current political differences, albeit of a fundamental nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment